Introduction
For decades, Talaq-e-Biddat or triple talaq remained one of the most controversial and emotionally charged issues within Muslim personal law in India. While divorce is an acknowledged part of Islamic jurisprudence, the specific practice of instant triple talaq—where a man could unilaterally and irrevocably divorce his wife by simply uttering “talaq” thrice in one sitting—raised both theological and constitutional concerns. This practice, seen by many as patriarchal and arbitrary, persisted for centuries before finally being struck down by the Indian Supreme Court in the landmark Shayara Bano v. Union of India judgment in 2017.
The legal battle surrounding triple talaq was more than just a religious issue; it was a reflection of the ongoing debate between personal law and fundamental rights, between tradition and reform, and between religious freedom and gender justice. This blog delves into the historical evolution of Talaq-e-Biddat, its theological position in Islamic jurisprudence, and the journey that led to one of the most defining moments in Indian legal history: the Shayara Bano case.
Understanding Triple Talaq: Theological Background
In order to understand the legal controversy, it is essential to comprehend the religious foundations—or the lack thereof—of Talaq-e-Biddat. The Quran, which is the primary source of Islamic law, prescribes a detailed and patient method of divorce that emphasizes reconciliation, dialogue, and mediation. Surah Al-Baqarah (2:229–230) speaks of divorce being pronounced twice, with waiting periods and opportunities for settlement between each pronouncement. The Hadith literature further reinforces this idea by discouraging hasty divorce and emphasizing the need for compassion.
Talaq-e-Sunnat, the form of divorce practiced and approved by the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), aligns with these teachings. It is revocable, progressive, and allows for reflection and reconciliation. In contrast, Talaq-e-Biddat is a later innovation introduced during the Umayyad dynasty. The term “biddat” itself signifies innovation—indicating a departure from prophetic tradition.
Most Islamic jurists agree that Talaq-e-Biddat is sinful, discouraged, and morally wrong, although some, particularly in the Hanafi school, accept it as legally valid. However, other major schools—Maliki, Shafi’i, and Hanbali—do not recognize it as an effective form of divorce. The Shia schools of law reject it altogether. This diversity in interpretation has led to confusion and misuse in many Muslim societies, especially where codified law has not replaced customary practice.
In our earlier blog, Talaq-e-Sunnat and Talaq-e-Biddat: A Detailed Comparison, we explored these theological distinctions in depth.
Triple Talaq in Colonial and Post-Colonial India
During the British colonial era, the East India Company gradually adopted a policy of non-interference in religious laws. As a result, Muslim personal law, including the practice of Talaq-e-Biddat, continued to be governed largely by customary and religious interpretations. There was no codification or reform initiated in this area. Even as the British introduced common law principles and statutory laws in areas like contracts, property, and crime, personal law remained untouched.
After independence, the Indian state adopted a secular Constitution that allowed communities to retain their personal laws under the umbrella of religious freedom. Article 25 guaranteed freedom of conscience and the right to profess, practice, and propagate religion, while Article 44 of the Directive Principles urged the state to move towards a Uniform Civil Code (UCC). However, due to political sensitivity and fear of backlash, successive governments avoided interfering in Muslim personal law.
As a result, Talaq-e-Biddat continued to be practiced in India, even though many Muslim-majority countries—like Egypt, Tunisia, Indonesia, and Pakistan—had reformed or abolished it. The disconnect between religious reform globally and legal stagnation in India created space for abuse, especially in cases where women were unilaterally divorced without notice, often through letters, phone calls, or even WhatsApp messages.
Our blog Application of Muslim Law in India traces how Islamic personal law survived colonial and post-colonial transitions in India.
The Case of Shayara Bano: A Personal Tragedy Becomes National Litigation
Shayara Bano, a woman from Uttarakhand, was married in 2002. After enduring 15 years of alleged domestic abuse, dowry harassment, and medical negligence, she was divorced by her husband through Talaq-e-Biddat—a triple talaq sent via post. The trauma of being discarded in an instant, with no prior warning or legal procedure, led her to approach the Supreme Court in 2016. Her petition challenged not just triple talaq, but also polygamy and nikah halala, as violative of her fundamental rights under Articles 14, 15, 21, and 25.
Her courage sparked a national movement. Several women’s rights groups, legal scholars, and Muslim women’s collectives supported her cause. The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), however, opposed any interference, arguing that personal law was protected under the right to religious freedom.
The case eventually reached a five-judge Constitutional Bench in 2017. The judges represented five different faiths—Hindu, Muslim, Christian, Sikh, and Parsi—symbolizing India’s pluralistic commitment to justice.
The Supreme Court’s Judgment: 3:2 Verdict Against Triple Talaq
On August 22, 2017, the Supreme Court delivered its historic verdict in Shayara Bano v. Union of India. In a 3:2 majority, the Court held that Talaq-e-Biddat is unconstitutional and void. The bench was split as follows:
- Justice Rohinton Nariman, Justice U.U. Lalit, and Justice Kurian Joseph held that triple talaq is arbitrary, violates Article 14 (right to equality), and is not protected under Article 25 (freedom of religion) because it is not essential to Islam.
- Chief Justice J.S. Khehar and Justice Abdul Nazeer dissented, stating that personal laws are part of religious freedom and any reform should come from legislation, not judiciary.
Justice Kurian Joseph’s opinion emphasized that triple talaq has no foundation in the Quran and goes against the teachings of Prophet Muhammad. Justice Nariman ruled it arbitrary, and therefore violative of the Constitution.
The Court’s decision effectively nullified the practice. However, it also noted that Parliament should pass legislation to regulate Muslim divorce. This recommendation paved the way for statutory reform.
The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, 2019
In 2019, the Indian Parliament passed The Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Act, criminalizing the practice of Talaq-e-Biddat. Key features of the law included:
- Declaring triple talaq illegal and void.
- Making it a cognizable and non-bailable offence, punishable with three years’ imprisonment.
- Allowing the woman to seek subsistence allowance and custody of children.
The law was both praised and criticized. Supporters saw it as a victory for Muslim women’s rights, while critics argued that criminalizing a civil act (divorce) was excessive. There were concerns that it might be misused or that it disproportionately targeted Muslim men. Nonetheless, the law remains in force and has brought India in line with other Muslim nations that have long abandoned the practice.
We explore this legislative development in more detail in our upcoming blog, Muslim Women Act, 2019: Legal Safeguards after Triple Talaq.
Global Perspectives and Comparative Developments
India was not the first country to outlaw Talaq-e-Biddat. Muslim-majority nations across Asia and the Middle East had recognized the need for reform long before. Egypt declared in 1929 that triple talaq in one sitting would be counted as a single pronouncement. Pakistan followed suit in 1961, requiring that divorces be registered and a reconciliation process be followed. Tunisia, Bangladesh, Jordan, and Morocco have all adopted laws that limit or nullify the effect of triple talaq.
These reforms show that Islamic jurisprudence allows for reinterpretation and evolution in response to changing social realities. They also refute the idea that banning triple talaq is an attack on Islam—it is, rather, a return to Islamic values of fairness, reflection, and mutual respect in marriage and divorce.
We will be discussing this comparative jurisprudence in detail in a later blog: Reforms in Muslim Divorce Law: Lessons from Muslim Countries.
The Impact on Muslim Women’s Legal Status
The striking down of triple talaq and the enactment of the 2019 law have empowered Muslim women like never before. They can now challenge arbitrary divorces, seek legal remedies, and demand dignity in marital relations. The judgment and subsequent law have also encouraged more Muslim women to speak out against oppressive practices, promoting awareness and legal consciousness in conservative communities.
However, challenges remain. Social stigma, lack of legal awareness, and procedural delays continue to hinder justice. Effective implementation of the law and widespread legal literacy are essential for achieving real change.
We discussed the broader implications of Muslim women’s rights in our earlier blog, Maintenance of Divorced Muslim Women: Shah Bano to Present Day.
Conclusion
The journey from blind acceptance of Talaq-e-Biddat to its judicial invalidation and legislative prohibition reflects India’s evolving legal and social landscape. The Shayara Bano case marked a watershed moment, not only in Muslim personal law but also in the broader struggle for gender justice in India. It demonstrated that personal laws, no matter how deeply rooted in tradition, must evolve to uphold constitutional values.
At its core, the case was about fairness, dignity, and equality. The abolition of triple talaq is not an end, but the beginning of a more informed and balanced approach to Islamic divorce law in India. It is now up to scholars, communities, and lawmakers to ensure that reforms continue and that personal laws are interpreted in a way that aligns both with religious principles and constitutional morality.
Our next post in this Islamic law series will cover the much-discussed topic of Talaq by Wife: Khula and Talaq-e-Tafweez, exploring the rights of Muslim women in initiating divorce.
: Legal History and the Shayara Bano Case){kind=link}